Case record
The best packing known for 34 squares, side 6, Nagamochi 2005

n=34

O= corrects Nagamochi 2005proved

s(34)=6

6
567
5.8316.831
nn+1

Proven

s(34)=6

  • optimal
  • exact

Citation record n-034

lowerchelokot 2026, GitHub corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-086)

Bounds

Best known packing

6

Found by
Nagamochi 2005
Construction
hand
Source
[Kingbird]
Evidence
E-kingbird-upper-register
Verified upper bound

6

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-basic-grid-upper
Reported lower bound

6

Proved by
Nagamochi 2005
Kind
Nagamochi
Note
General closed form: s(N) >= min(ceil(sqrt(N)), sqrt(N - 2*floor(sqrt(N)) + 1) + 1).
Source
[Nagamochi 2005]
Evidence
E-nagamochi-lower
Verified lower bound

6

The reported value, verified here.

Corrects
Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
Evidence
E-chelokot-square-minus-two-lean
Gap

0

Solved: the verified bounds meet.

Results in the register

  • T-007 V0 C1 Nagamochi · 2026-08-31 · 321 cases

    s(n)≥min(⌈n⌉,n−2⌊n⌋+1+1) for 4≤n≤324

  • T-058 V3 C3 Hosono after Tokoharu, Daniel · 2026-09-29 · 100 cases

    Rectangle-certificate ceiling α·UB(n) proved for n=1..100; B·UB(n) on 64 grid rows

  • T-083 V3 C3 Karakuş · 2026-10-02 · 301 cases

    s(n)≥1/2+n−⌊n⌋+1/4 for every nonsquare 8≤n≤324

  • T-085 V3 C3 Karakuş; Vlasenko · 2026-10-02 · 315 cases

    Nagamochi 2005, Lemma 1 is false for every container with a>3 and b>2

  • T-086 V3 C3 Vlasenko · 2026-10-02 · 16 cases

    s(k2−2)=k for every integer k≥2; k=3…18 are the cases held here

  • T-124 V0 C0 Daniel after Couzo · 2026-10-07 · 178 cases

    Reported non-strict local minima for 178 source configurations

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: replayed here

—

Rigidity

not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision

Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid

Scope

Square 28 of the retained witness (witness id 29) translates 1 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 3 of its 34 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.

s(34) — solved

s(34)=6, from Nagamochi’s infinite family s(m2−1)=s(m2−2)=m at m=6. Corrected 3 October 2026: the verified lower bound here is chelokot’s Lean theorem s(n2−2)=n, replayed here with its axiom receipt (T-086); Nagamochi’s result is a reported bound, his Lemma 1 being false (Karakuş 2026; review). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516; this record’s prose was missed by the correction of 2 October and is corrected here.

The packing

Found by Nagamochi in 2005, via a hand construction.

The lower bound

The strongest lower bound independently verified in this record is chelokot’s Lean theorem s(n2−2)=n at n=6 (T-086). Nagamochi’s general closed form, s(N)≥min(⌈N⌉,N−2⌊N⌋+1+1), is recorded as a reported bound: its published proof rests on his Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false.

See the Frontier corpus summary for the current aggregate count; source-reported bounds are recorded separately.

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-chelokot-square-minus-two-lean replayed here producer’s code V-chelokot-lean (external); V-replay-chelokot-lean (first-party, premises)
verified upper E-basic-grid-upper replayed here independent V-check-basic-bounds (first-party)