T-162: New packings of 129, 204 and 303 squares, a cut-out and two compositions, each certified exactly

V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-186 and T-225

2026-10-12 published · Ostashev after Nakajima, Chaoweeraprasit, Daniel, Xu, Levy · n=129,204,303

Three complete rational source certificates report finite upper-bound improvements at the exact sides they state: s(129)≤59350069252022321722894267696423193212052484284509904682889059350069252022321722894267696423193212052484284509904682889/5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, s(204)≤74043316171934782832354950404729823976428779059647971914573074043316171934782832354950404729823976428779059647971914573/5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 and s(303)≤179099582910699079815957410813987360800486270805270137352241179099582910699079815957410813987360800486270805270137352241/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

All nine retained jobs, the three positives with their duplicate-square and outside-container controls, were decided again here on 14 October 2026 by both maintained exact routes and equal their retained rows. A third exact route, half-extent containment and exact intersection area, decided the three certificates with six controls each and held each retained file to its upstream bytes, fetched at the pin. No route here is the source's code, and the source ran none of them, so the replay is independently re-implemented. The 14 October review found no blocking defect.

The author reports that each packing passes its own C++ checker (sqverify --precise --certify, MPFR then GMP rationals) at delta = 1e-60, that sqverify --check-cert certifies the shipped certificates in GMP rationals with no dilation and no tolerance, and that a separately written 80-digit mpmath cross-check finds a least separation of 5.0e-21; the issue states that all three checkers are the author's, written with AI assistance, the first two sharing the C++ parser and geometry. It also states that each side is the exact first-order optimum of its contact topology, with nonnegative KKT multipliers at a 60-digit solution and the load-bearing squares scaled by 1 + 1e-20. Those statements are the author's; no source program ran here.

Credit Ostashev (https://github.com/dostashev/square-packing) with the three packings and their certificates. The issue says 204 and 303 are new arrangements: two copies of a new rectangle packing in opposite corners with aligned squares filling the rest, 44 unit squares in an (h + 3) x h rectangle at 204 and 62 in an (h + 6) x h rectangle at 303, both found by a GPU soft-to-rigid search after Nakajima's idea, started from corner staircases.

129 is a cut-out: a 163-square (h + 3) x h rectangle cut from the s(302) house, Chaoweeraprasit's packing in Daniel's regularization, re-optimised as a rectangle, less its three rightmost unit columns; its aligned blocks are laid out like Xu's s(129) and its tilted squares sit in a different band, so the issue calls it a different local optimum and not a refinement of Xu's. Each was solved to the exact optimum of its contact topology. The author asks to be credited and leaves the pieces' acknowledgement to the record.

The issue states AI assistance: an AI-assisted research loop the author drives with his own ideas, the rectangle library and composition being his; AI agents wrote and ran the search, composition and verification code, and an agent's check of the library against the register found 129.

Measured pose by pose by that review, no symmetry of the box pairs the 129 square for square with Xu's packing or T-146's, though 46 of Xu's squares lie in place under a quarter turn, and the 204 and 303 are new arrangements; that the 129 is cut from the s(302) house is the author's statement, consistent with the measurements and established by none of them. At 129, 204 and 303 PR 574's certificates (T-174) are smaller, by 1.18e-19, 1.46e-19 and 1.79e-19, and were held for the owner from 15 October until the house rule of 16 October 2026 lifted the hold. Meanwhile this entry held the three cases, the smallest certificates there that the hold left in. The adoption of 16 October 2026 (PR #657) made Polkovskyi's T-186, smaller than T-174, the house at all three.

Significance, composition and next rung
Significance
New arrangements at 204 and 303 and a cut-out at 129, 2.02e-03 to 1.42e-02 below the case ceilings, as T-158 is; no lower bound or optimum.
Next rung
V4 and C4 need a second accepted adversarial review by a distinct reviewer and a retained human oversight record; one AI review, of 14 October, is retained.
Novelty
previously-published Present in an identified source

The cases

Case record
Regularized by the Squares Project with Daniel's regularizer (evand/square-packing, MIT)
As published
The packing as published, Ostashev 2026 [Mishapolk KKT refinements 2026-10-14]

n=129

11.3711.870
111213
11.35812.358
nn+1

Proven

11.37428≤s(129)≤11.870014

  • exact

Citation record n-129

lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)

upperOstashev et al., GitHub (confirmed T-186)

Open

  • optimality

The case record

LowerUpper
Gap0.49573226…
Case record

n=204

14.2914.809
141516
14.28315.283
nn+1

Proven

14.29311≤s(204)≤14.808643

  • exact

Citation record n-204

lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)

upperCouzo & Daniel, GitHub (confirmed T-225)

Open

  • optimality

The case record

LowerUpper
Gap0.51552861…
Case record
Regularized by the Squares Project with its own axis tool (regularize_axis_components/2)
As published
The packing as published, Ostashev 2026 [Mishapolk KKT refinements 2026-10-14]

n=303

17.4117.910
171819
17.40718.407
nn+1

Proven

17.41892≤s(303)≤17.909959

  • exact

Citation record n-303

lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)

upperOstashev et al., GitHub (confirmed T-186)

Open

  • optimality

The case record

LowerUpper
Gap0.49103397…

Results on these cases

26 results in the register on n=129,204,303, oldest first, each with what it established and how it stands now.

  1. 2005 published T-007 · n=129,204,303

    s(n)≥min(⌈n⌉,n−2⌊n⌋+1+1) for 4≤n≤324

    V0 C1 Lower bound incomplete on these cases, superseded by T-083 and T-180 (reported)

    Nagamochi · Nagamochi 2005 · source · register

  2. 2026-09-04 published T-085 · n=129,204,303

    Nagamochi 2005, Lemma 1 is false for every container with a>3 and b>2

    V3 C3 Correction confirmed

    Karakuş; Vlasenko · Karakuş 2026 · chelokot Nagamochi counterexample 2026 · packet · register

  3. 2026-09-27 published T-056 · n=303

    Smaller packings for 49 counts from n=68 to 307, each certified two independent ways

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-186

    Couzo · franciscouzo square-packing 2026-09-27 · packet · register

  4. 2026-09-29 published T-083 · n=129,204,303

    s(n)≥1/2+n−⌊n⌋+1/4 for every nonsquare 8≤n≤324

    V3 C3 Lower bound confirmed

    Karakuş · Karakuş 2026 · source · register

  5. 2026-10-03 published T-092 · n=303

    Smaller packings again at seven counts from n=208 to 306, each certified two independent ways

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-186

    Couzo · franciscouzo square-packing 2026-10-03 · packet · register

  6. 2026-10-05 published T-098 · n=303

    Exact optima of 48 known-best packings: s(n) ≤ S', 3.5e-13 to 5.0e-11 below each printed side

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on these cases, superseded by T-186

    Daniel after Couzo, de Winter, Ellsworth, Levy · evand exact optima 2026-10-05 · packet · register

  7. 2026-10-05 published T-101 · n=129,204

    Exact certificates of 77 catalogue packings: s(n) ≤ S', 1.2e-16 to 9.8e-15 above each side

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on these cases, superseded by T-186 and T-225

    Daniel after Couzo, de Winter, Ellsworth, Levy · evand exact optima 2026-10-05 · packet · register

  8. 2026-10-07 published T-113 · n=129,303

    s(n)≤Sn at ten counts, n=108 to 303, from new SQUISH rational packings

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-186

    Chaoweeraprasit after Ellsworth · SQUISH ten packings 2026-10-07 · packet · register

  9. 2026-10-07 published T-115 · n=129

    s(n)≤Sn at twelve counts, from the SQUISH update’s new and smaller rational packings

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-186

    Chaoweeraprasit after Couzo and Ellsworth · SQUISH update 2026-10-07 · packet · register

  10. 2026-10-08 published T-125 · n=129

    Complete rational construction reports at 25 counts

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-186

    Xu · ry-xu square packing 2026 · packet · register

  11. 2026-10-08 published T-127 · n=129

    Fourteen rational refinements, seventeen complete source cases

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on these cases, superseded by T-186

    Gupta after Chaoweeraprasit, Daniel · Gupta rational refinements 2026-10-08 · packet · register

  12. 2026-10-09 published T-134 · n=303

    Six exact rational certificates from Couzo

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on these cases, superseded by T-186

    Couzo after Polkovskyi, Chaoweeraprasit, Gupta, Xu, Daniel, Ellsworth, Levy · Couzo exact certificates 2026-10-09 · packet · register

  13. 2026-10-09 published T-136 · n=303

    Seventeen exact rational packings from SQUISH's third request

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on these cases, superseded by T-186

    Chaoweeraprasit after Couzo, Xu, Göbel, Schadt, Ellsworth, Hajba, Levy · SQUISH third request 2026-10-09 · packet · register

  14. 2026-10-09 published T-138 · n=303

    Exact witnesses at Mishapolk's printed ceilings, the smallest known at 103 and 258 when registered

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-186

    Polkovskyi after Stenlund, Friedman, Ellsworth, Chaoweeraprasit, Couzo, Xu, Levy · Mishapolk decimal poses 2026-10-09 · packet · register

  15. 2026-10-10 published T-146 · n=129,303

    Exact rational certificates at fifteen counts from Daniel's regularized record lists

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on these cases, superseded by T-186

    Daniel after Xu, Chaoweeraprasit, Polkovskyi, Levy · Daniel regularized lists 2026-10-10 · packet · register

  16. 2026-10-12 established T-155 · n=204

    Exact regularized sides at 59 counts, 5.4e-20 to 9.9e-15 below the ceilings they replace

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on these cases, superseded by T-225

    Levy after Daniel · register

  17. 2026-10-12 published T-162 this result · n=129,204,303

    New packings of 129, 204 and 303 squares, a cut-out and two compositions, each certified exactly

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-186 and T-225

    Ostashev after Nakajima, Chaoweeraprasit, Daniel, Xu, Levy · Ostashev compositions 2026-10-12 · packet · register

  18. 2026-10-13 published T-174 · n=129,204,303

    Tighter certificates at 68 counts from PingYou Ltd, of others' packings and its own

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on these cases, superseded by T-186 and T-225

    PingYou Ltd after Friedman, Ellsworth, Daniel, Xu, Barnett, Couzo, Ostashev, Chaoweeraprasit, Gupta, Fang, Polkovskyi, Levy · PingYou PR 574 certificates 2026-10-13 · packet · register

  19. 2026-10-13 published T-180 · n=129,204,303

    Closed-form lower bound s(N)≥a(N) for every non-square N≥49, reported

    V0 C1 Lower bound reviewed

    Hosono · wand125 closed form 2026-10-14 · packet · packet · register

  20. 2026-10-14 published T-186 · n=129,204,303

    Exact certificates at twelve counts from Polkovskyi, tightening the smallest reported there

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed

    Polkovskyi after Ostashev, Couzo, PingYou Ltd, Levy · Mishapolk KKT refinements 2026-10-14 · packet · register

  21. 2026-10-16 published T-193 · n=204

    Exact algebraic sides at sixteen counts from Daniel, of packings the record credits

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on these cases, superseded by T-225

    Daniel after Xu, Chaoweeraprasit, Ostashev, Couzo, PingYou Ltd, Gupta, Polkovskyi, Levy · Daniel exact current records 2026-10-16 · packet · register

  22. 2026-10-17 published T-226 · n=204

    Couzo's 204 of #670, below Polkovskyi's T-186, since superseded by his own #675 and #678

    V0 C0 Upper bound recorded superseded by T-225

    Couzo after Polkovskyi, Daniel, Levy · Couzo issue 670 2026-10-17 · packet · packet · register

  23. 2026-10-18 published T-223 · n=204

    Couzo's smaller packings at 204 and 260, the two in the corpus of issue 678's 85 bounds

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-225

    Couzo after de Winter, Polkovskyi, Daniel, Fang, PingYou Ltd, Levy · Couzo issue 678 2026-10-18 · packet · register

  24. 2026-10-18 published T-228 · n=204

    Couzo's 204 of #675, below his #670, since superseded by his #678

    V0 C0 Upper bound recorded superseded by T-225

    Couzo after Polkovskyi, Daniel, Levy · Couzo issue 675 2026-10-18 · packet · packet · register

  25. 2026-10-20 published T-225 · n=204

    Daniel's solved, regularized views at 204, 227, 229 and 260, each the smallest side reported there

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed

    Daniel after Couzo, de Winter, Polkovskyi, Levy · Daniel regularized lists 2026-10-20 · packet · register

  26. 2026-10-22 published T-229 · n=204

    Polkovskyi's re-solves of the house packings at 105 and 204, below T-174 and T-225

    V0 C0 Upper bound recorded

    Polkovskyi after Couzo, Muglich, Daniel, Xu, PingYou Ltd, Levy · Mishapolk issue 719 2026-10-22 · packet · register