T-231: Polkovskyi's lower re-solve at 204 of Couzo's packing, 1.48e-11 below T-229

V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-257

2026-10-22 published · Polkovskyi after Couzo, Ostashev, PingYou Ltd, Daniel, Levy · n=204

One complete rational source certificate of issue 719 reports a finite upper-bound improvement at the exact side it states: s(204)≤14.808642830513087197802415708703, below T-229, the case's house best packing when it was registered here, by 1.48e-11, and below T-225, the house when the author claimed it, by 1.01e-8. Since 24 October 2026 the case holds it as its house best packing.

The certificate and its duplicate-square and outside-container controls were decided here on 23 October 2026 by both maintained exact routes, with sharp controls at exact contact and 1e-30 past it. The author says he imported this repository's sqpack/verify.py as a module, and the maintained exact_verify route decides through that file, so that replay shares the producer's named components. The 23 October stage 4 review decided the certificate again on a clean-room checker of its own that shares no code with either route or the source, and found no blocking defect: the bound is confirmed, independently re-implemented.

It is the second 204 file of issue 719's release, published on 22 October 2026 in the same commit as T-229's certificate. The issue named the other file, which T-229 registers; the author claimed this one in his comment of 22 October on the issue, after T-229 was registered. Measured here, the two files are one solved packing at two paddings: T-229's certificate is this one dilated by about 1 + 1e-12, so no square moves beyond 2.02e-11 between them.

Measured here, it is the exact solved side of T-229's packing. Its side and the 119 rows that Daniel's exact solver (exactsolve.py, MIT) determines equal that solver's output for T-229's witness, row for row, at the solver's padding of 1e-20; the other 85 rows are the solver's free squares and frozen flat variables. The source does not name the solver, so the record states it as a measured method, not as an antecedent of the packing, and the author is asked which program wrote the file. The project's regularization run of 22 October on T-229's witness reached the same side.

The author's comment of 23 October says he checked his certificates with sqpack/verify.py imported in a batch harness and with Daniel's verify_cert.py and verify_cert2.py as archived in Couzo's repository. Those statements are the author's; no source program ran here.

Credit Couzo's packing, first reported in #670 and refined in #675 and #678 (T-226, T-228, T-223), re-solved to a smaller side by Polkovskyi (https://github.com/Mishapolk/square-packing-records), whose continuous SQP optimization started from Couzo's #678 certificate in Couzo's frame, as his comment of 23 October on issue 719 says; Couzo's answer of 23 October on #670 traces the seed of his search to Polkovskyi's own T-186 packing, his refinement of Ostashev's packing as PingYou Ltd refined it. The issue discloses Gemini assistance.

Significance, composition and next rung
Significance
The solved side of T-229's packing at 204, at Daniel's exact solver's padding of 1e-20, 1.48e-11 below T-229, which certifies the same point padded by 1e-12 (T-229 is this certificate dilated by 1 + 1.000055e-12 to within 2.9e-15). That is T-225's case, the solved exact side of a packing already reported 1.76e-11 to 1.39e-9 below its certificate, S2. The step is padding alone, but eight orders above the padding the record scores S1 (T-170, T-174, T-186, at most 1.8e-19), and it moves the case's 12-place print (14.808642830528 to 14.808642830514), as at T-229's 105 (S2). A citable detail that moves no theorem; no lower bound, optimum or local minimum.
Next rung
None for the bound. V4 and C4 need a second accepted adversarial review by a distinct reviewer and a retained human oversight record; one AI review, of 23 October, is retained.
Regularizations
n = 204: a regularization of T-229’s packing by Polkovskyi (the exact solved side of T-229's packing, whose determined rows equal Daniel's exact solver's (exactsolve.py) row for row at its padding of 1e-20, as measured here; the author's comment of 23 October states a continuous SQP solve from Couzo's #678 certificate; solved to its side; identity: measured here; nearest centres one to one; 0 squares moved, at most 2.02e-11; no square turned).
Novelty
previously-published Present in an identified source

The case

Case record
Regularized by the Squares Project with Daniel's regularizer (evand/square-packing, MIT)
As published
The packing as published, in its source’s pose, Daniel 2026 [Daniel issue 845 2026-10-29]

n=204

14.2914.808
141516
14.28315.283
nn+1

Proven

14.29311≤s(204)≤14.807628

  • exact

Citation record n-204

lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)

upperDaniel 2026, GitHub (confirmed T-257)

Open

  • optimality

The case record

LowerUpper
Gap0.51451324…

Results on the case

17 results in the register on n=204, oldest first, each with what it established and how it stands now.

  1. 2005 published T-007

    s(n)≥min(⌈n⌉,n−2⌊n⌋+1+1) for 4≤n≤324

    V0 C1 Lower bound incomplete on this case, superseded by T-083 and T-180 (reported)

    Nagamochi · Nagamochi 2005 · source · register

  2. 2026-09-04 published T-085

    Nagamochi 2005, Lemma 1 is false for every container with a>3 and b>2

    V3 C3 Correction confirmed

    Karakuş; Vlasenko · Karakuş 2026 · chelokot Nagamochi counterexample 2026 · packet · register

  3. 2026-09-29 published T-083

    s(n)≥1/2+n−⌊n⌋+1/4 for every nonsquare 8≤n≤324

    V3 C3 Lower bound confirmed

    Karakuş · Karakuş 2026 · source · register

  4. 2026-10-05 published T-101

    Exact certificates of 77 catalogue packings: s(n) ≤ S', 1.2e-16 to 9.8e-15 above each side

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on this case, superseded by T-257

    Daniel after Couzo, de Winter, Ellsworth, Levy · evand exact optima 2026-10-05 · packet · register

  5. 2026-10-12 established T-155

    Exact regularized sides at 59 counts, 5.4e-20 to 9.9e-15 below the ceilings they replace

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on this case, superseded by T-257

    Levy after Daniel · register

  6. 2026-10-12 published T-162

    New packings of 129, 204 and 303 squares, a cut-out and two compositions, each certified exactly

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-257

    Ostashev after Nakajima, Chaoweeraprasit, Daniel, Xu, Levy · Ostashev compositions 2026-10-12 · packet · register

  7. 2026-10-13 published T-174

    Tighter certificates at 68 counts from PingYou Ltd, of others' packings and its own

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on this case, superseded by T-257

    PingYou Ltd after Friedman, Ellsworth, Daniel, Xu, Barnett, Couzo, Ostashev, Chaoweeraprasit, Gupta, Fang, Polkovskyi, Levy · PingYou PR 574 certificates 2026-10-13 · packet · register

  8. 2026-10-13 published T-180

    Closed-form lower bound s(N)≥a(N) for every non-square N≥49, reported

    V0 C1 Lower bound reviewed

    Hosono · wand125 closed form 2026-10-14 · packet · packet · register

  9. 2026-10-14 published T-186

    Exact certificates at twelve counts from Polkovskyi, tightening the smallest reported there

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on this case, superseded by T-257

    Polkovskyi after Ostashev, Couzo, PingYou Ltd, Levy · Mishapolk KKT refinements 2026-10-14 · packet · register

  10. 2026-10-16 published T-193

    Exact algebraic sides at sixteen counts from Daniel, of packings the record credits

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on this case, superseded by T-257

    Daniel after Xu, Chaoweeraprasit, Ostashev, Couzo, PingYou Ltd, Gupta, Polkovskyi, Levy · Daniel exact current records 2026-10-16 · packet · register

  11. 2026-10-17 published T-226

    Couzo's 204 of #670, below Polkovskyi's T-186, since superseded by his own #675 and #678

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-257

    Couzo after Polkovskyi, Ostashev, PingYou Ltd, Daniel, Levy · Couzo issue 670 2026-10-17 · packet · packet · register

  12. 2026-10-18 published T-223

    Couzo's smaller packings at 204 and 260, the two in the corpus of issue 678's 85 bounds

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-257

    Couzo after de Winter, Polkovskyi, Ostashev, Daniel, Fang, PingYou Ltd, Levy · Couzo issue 678 2026-10-18 · packet · register

  13. 2026-10-18 published T-228

    Couzo's 204 of #675, below his #670, since superseded by his #678

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-257

    Couzo after Polkovskyi, Ostashev, PingYou Ltd, Daniel, Levy · Couzo issue 675 2026-10-18 · packet · packet · register

  14. 2026-10-20 published T-225

    Daniel's solved, regularized views at 204, 227, 229 and 260, each the smallest side reported there

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on this case, superseded by T-257

    Daniel after Couzo, de Winter, Polkovskyi, Ostashev, PingYou Ltd, Levy · Daniel regularized lists 2026-10-20 · packet · register

  15. 2026-10-22 published T-229

    Polkovskyi's re-solves of the house packings at 105 and 204, below T-174 and T-225

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed on this case, superseded by T-257

    Polkovskyi after Couzo, Muglich, Daniel, Xu, Ostashev, PingYou Ltd, Levy · Mishapolk issue 719 2026-10-22 · packet · register

  16. 2026-10-22 published T-231 this result

    Polkovskyi's lower re-solve at 204 of Couzo's packing, 1.48e-11 below T-229

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed superseded by T-257

    Polkovskyi after Couzo, Ostashev, PingYou Ltd, Daniel, Levy · Mishapolk n204 2026-10-22 · packet · register

  17. 2026-10-29 published T-257

    Daniel's new packings of 172, 204, 260 and 293 squares, 1.64e-4 to 1.18e-2 below each house

    V3 C3 Upper bound confirmed

    Daniel after Chaoweeraprasit, Gupta, Ostashev, kirilltym, Friedman · Daniel issue 845 2026-10-29 · packet · register